This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
A few editors seem to think that the notability of this company is questionable, and the latest argument is that there is no independent sourcing. Are all the sources from steakescape.com? ...No? Then that argument doesn't apply. (And if it did, worst-case scenario, a {{primarysources}} tag could be placed instead.) Erpertblah, blah, blah...11:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Are "all the sources from steakescape.com"? No, but that doesn't make make them independent, as any reasonable, competent editor would acknowledge. A press release hosted on PR Newswire isn't independent, nor is a presskit piece from one of the subject's business partners. Stop wasting the time of competent, constructive editors by insisting on personal standards that depart so widely from widely accepted policies and guidelines. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the secondary sources here do not seem to be very significant - only announcements of new locations and menu items. Perhaps it may be time to take another look at the notability or rework this article? ~RAM (talk) 09:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
