This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
It should be noted that Statista is a deeply unreliable source, a casual glance at its research shows obvious, basic, flaws - for example rating the US as the #1 most prepared country for a pandemic. It's just a for-profit seller of market analytics, and has no incentive to be honest or transparent. Any reference relying on it should be considered suspect. [some random who cannot into wikipedia, but dislikes poor sources] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.250.102 (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have a strong interest in business and economics, and research is genetically coded in my blood. The only thing I dislike more than a paywall, is a business that purports to be a number-cruncher with friendly, easy to digest market trends that are prepared by the throwing of darts.
My background editing here is mostly screaming at my monitor. But,
Question: would I do best working in the sandbox? Should I just do or die and let someone else mop after me?
The happiest of New Years with the blessings we deserve and need progressing through some of the weirder times we have had to face. BBMcD (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=icon}
