Talk:State of Denial

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the State of Denial article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Redirections

I setup redirs from State of Denial and State of Denial (book), per MoS. The other use (film) is not nearly as widely covered as the book. I think I got everything right. /Blaxthos 00:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This article is biased. "When a Woodward book comes out, public speculation starts about who the sources likely are, often because they end up looking good in his books." Really? Not disputing that, necessarily, but that's conjecture. I'm yanking it.

Citing David Frum, and to a lesser extent, Jonathan Karl, as the only reviews of this book is a bit like having various Muslims comment on the Mohammed cartoon conspiracy. Woody Taylor 13:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So do the work Woody, and cite other sources. The notice belongs on top of the section, not the whole article. Noroton 05:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just replaced the full page notice with the section NPOV notice.Noroton 05:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. So, just for my own clarification, my understanding was that I should throw up an NPOV notice until comment was made. And did clean up other sections, and there are still NPOV issues remaining...such as the "sources" section (e.g., Woodward is explicit about sources where he can be), etc. Please clarify as I'm not trying to leave you with the short end of the editing stick. Thought it presumptuous just to change things myself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.72.228.76 (talk) 02:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]