Talk:State Arsenal (Providence, Rhode Island)

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War / World War I / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Rhode Island Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Low-importance).

RfC: Gallery contents and formatting

Which of these two contents and formats for this article's gallery is preferred?

Gallery #1 (in situ)

An 1888 engraving of the arsenal
A 1918 sketch of the building
A 1920 photograph of the arsenal

Gallery #2 (in situ)

An 1888 engraving of the arsenal
A 1918 sketch of the building
A 1920 photograph of the arsenal

Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A neutral pointer to this discussion has been placed on the talk pages of the WikiProjects listed above. WP:CANVASSING of individual editors should be avoided. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

#1 - The version of the middle of the three images in Gallery #1 is easier for the reader to see, and all three images are better at the slightly larger size they are presented at in that gallery. Centering the gallery looks neater and more professional. The smaller postage-stamp size of Gallery #2 does the reader a disservice by being so small and cramped. Gallery #2 is at the default size, but, as per WP:Gallery:

The default size of a gallery should be understood as simply the size that images are presented at if nothing else is specified, not as the preferred size of the images.

We are given the capability of adjusting the size of images in the gallery for a reason, to better present them to the reader in a form that is easy to see and understand. Gallery #1 performs that task better than Gallery #2. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I usually don't care for packed galleries, but I am fine with the alternate offered by MB, Gallery #3. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

#3 - looks best to me. MB 02:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

#1 - I prefer No. 1 with a specified fix width. But the specified fixed height should be omitted per WP:IMGSIZE, imo. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The height is not fixed (note that the middle image is not as tall as the other two), the height parameter sets the maximum height with the width that's specified and the aspect ratio unchanged. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks. That was not clear to me from the image & gallery help type pages before, but that does make sense. -Fnlayson (talk) 04:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

#2 I do not really care about the alignment or using mode=packed so long as it looks good in the article. What I do care about is image size. #2 is slightly too small, but #2 is noticeably improperly large on my browser. $ɱ$ (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
#1 Yes, I agree with -Fnlayson Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
#2 Filetime (talk) 18:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
#3 Looks better. BristolTreeHouse (talk) 10:42, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
#1 Preference on the first one. Sea Ane (talk) 21:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
#1 The nature of the drawings/photograph in this case make the images hard to distinguish when they are made very small. The first options looks better and is more useful, the 2nd option might as well be linked text since you need to click on them to actually see anything. Also, it's not like this is some big, cluttered article. Option 1 looks good at the end of the article. PraiseVivec (talk) 11:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
#3/3A The borders are unnecessary imo. Some1 (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
#3 I generally prefer a packed gallery, especially if there are only a few photos. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 22:23, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Gallery #3 (an alternate offered by MB)

An 1888 engraving of the arsenal
A 1918 sketch of the building
A 1920 photograph of the arsenal

This appears huge on my computer screen, way too improper a size for images on Wikipedia. $ɱ$ (talk) 14:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two points:

(1) Here's what it would look like in the context of the entire page: [1]

(2) It's simple enough to reduce the size, such as this:

Gallery #3A (same as above, but height reduced from 225px to 200px; in situ)

An 1888 engraving of the arsenal
A 1918 sketch of the building
A 1920 photograph of the arsenal

Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]