Talk:Stargate SG-1 season 10

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / Stargate

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Stargate task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Last version fo episode articles before they were redirected here

For merging, transwikiing, etc.

– sgeureka ^t•c 17:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of Company of Thieves

Company of Thieves doesn't contain anything that can't fit into this season article as well. Unless the article is expanded to something like Zero Hour (Stargate SG-1), I see no reason not to merge (per WP:EPISODE). – sgeureka ^t•c 11:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merged. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

avetao or anetao?

is the name of the person who hijaks th Odessy Avetao or Anetao? both of those spellings were used in the episode description.Hawkey131 (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted "Production" section

It was a trivia section in disguise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.102.244 (talk) 04:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the surface, I'd partly agree, but everything is trivia until put into context. What the section needs is more context, not removal. I have therefore reverted (for now). – sgeureka ^t•c 08:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I put the information from the "Production" section into the relevant episodes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.102.244 (talk) 01:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had to revert because something got screwed up, and I couldn't figure out what. (Plus, because of the transclusion, the production detail would also show up in the episode list, which is undesirable.) – sgeureka ^t•c 10:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]