Talk:Starfield Technologies

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Arizona Low‑importance

	Arizona portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV

I am not bold enough to dispute the POV myself, as I am a new editor, but IMHO it reads like an advertisment, I will do some research and edit in a couple of weeks, but right now, end of term is killing me. Life Now (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism is out of date

I agree about the general assertion about the subtle way that this software gets installed and its overall characterization. I found a new shortcut on my desktop and it took some effort to figure out who put it there. The Wikipedia entry here told me how it got there.

I first had to look at the shortcut properties to find the location of the program. Then, I had to turn on the compay name attribute in explorer to discover that the progrm the shortcut pointed to was developed by Starfield Technologies. IMO, this is not the kind of thing an average computer user would be able to do which leads me to agree that this program is bloatware and instrusive.

The Starfield web site could not be more obscure. It did reference GoDaddy but provided no information of any kind that would help anyone determine what the program did. It looked very suspicious to me. Why not provide the information if they didn't have anything to hide?

However, some of the assertions about the nature of the software on Windows is no longer valid. The version that got installed on my computer yesterday did not require Admin privileges and uninstalled quite easily.

In my case, it installed itself in the AppData\Local directory under the user account I used to check my GoDaddy account yesterday. It did not install itself in any other user account. I recall now installing a program so that I could paste a picture into an email. It didn't even work.

I found this page very useful in answering my questions, but it doesn't really serve as a good source of business information on Starfield Technologies. 15:26, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Ralphmackiewicz (talk) 15:26, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

>"uninstalled quite easily"

Are you sure it did uninstall completely?

176.20.208.58 (talk) 20:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]