Talk:Star Wars Miniatures

Star Wars Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

AT-AT

quote: "...with the AT-AT (scaled correctly to the other miniatures..." end quote

The AT-AT is not correctly scaled to other miniatures. All human-sized miniatures are taller than the AT-AT's foot, which is clearly not the case when compared to movie footage from Empire Strikes Back. Should the phrase scaled correctly be removed?

Also note that at the very least one other miniature (the AT-ST) appears to be on a smaller scale

Starship Battles Release

The Starship Battles set was been released in November - the article should be changed to refer to the release in past tense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.174.240.142 (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Set Lists

If this game is "collectible," why not display ALL of the set lists, like Wookieepedia.com? I like the collectible aspect of the game as well as the elements, gameplay, etc. but if we're going to make this a part of Wikipedia, the encyclopedic nature of this site sugguests that we should list the minis from all sets. Right? Mrobviousjosh 02:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you added all the set lists the page would be huge and growing out of control after each set release. what needs to be done is set up seperate pages for each set. set lists, scenarios, tactics, rules as of release, changes to those rules. this way you can read the page fast and if you want to see certain sets you can click the link. Danrduggan 21:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's too damn far!

For the different classes, what are the max number of square that they can attack? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.78.73.88 (talk) 14:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for visiting. Note that Wikipedia is not a dicussion site, nor a place to ask for help on the topics of article. The discussion pages like this are really a place to talk about improving the article. So you might get a helpful editor answering your questions, but typically such requests are going to be ignored. — Alan De Smet | Talk 02:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links to "Custom Star Wars Miniature Database" will be deleted

Links to "The Custom Star Wars Miniature Database" have been repeatedly deleted and will continue to be deleted unless the addition is improved. Fundamentally the link doesn't provide additional reference material about the article's topic. It's just a fan forum. Wikipedia is not a link site. We try to keep our external link lists to a minimal set of official sites and sites for more general information. — Alan De Smet | Talk 02:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed several other inappropriate external links from this section tonight. Rray (talk) 05:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]