Talk:Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Single-player section, this sentence ---> "between missions the player can assign credits to force powers of their choice", is very odd.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the Movie Battles and Development section, correctly link "Jedi Knight" to its correspondence article. In the Multiplayer section, it would be best if "Local area network" was followed by ---> (LAN), I mean, I know what it means, but how 'bout your reader.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:
Is TheForce.Net a reliable source? Cause the website says its a fansite.

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Image:Jabox.jpg has a weak FUR.
I've added a couple more points to the FUR - is it acceptable now? Una Laguna^Talk 07:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it works and thank you, kind stranger. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:41, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1A - I've rewritten the sentence to be more straight forward

Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1B - Done as suggested

Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2C - Not sure if it is considered reliable it's a prominent website on the topic but it is fan produced. I found the same information on Xbox.com which is reliable.

Alright, just checkin' and needed to know, check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Bill and Una Laguna for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]