Talk:Star Carr

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Star Carr is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

York Museums Trust High‑importance

	This article is related to the York Museums Trust and is relevant to the GLAM partnership between the trust and Wikimedia UK. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.York Museums TrustWikipedia:GLAM/YMTTemplate:WikiProject York Museums TrustYork Museums Trust-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.


	Star Carr covers content related to York Museums Trust. This organisation has participated in a GLAMwiki project. You may find interesting content related to the topic among their Archaeological collections of the Yorkshire Museum images or items or be find out more about them or from their staff at their GLAM Directory Page. They are keen to help through this and their participation in the global GLAMwiki Project

Template:Megalith

I've created a new template for megalithic sites, Template:Megalith, as used on Pikestones and Round Loaf. Some instructions on the template talk page, to show how to use it. Cheers! --PopUpPirate 13:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging with the 'Star Carr house' article?

Hi all,

I'm new on here but really keen to get going and thought I'd better start on my home-turf! I've been involved in the Star Carr project for 3 years (I'll try and maintain an NPOV - but I don't think there's anything too controversial anyway!). I'm planning to lengthen and update the main Star Carr piece. To many archaeologists (myself included) the site is as important as Stonehenge so it's information on here should reflect that. I think the house should be part of the main article personally along with sections for the original excavations, the other work in the Vale of Pickering (Schadla-Hall, Lane and Mellars etc.) and the subsequent re-interpretations of the site. Until I get some feedback I'll just do some fairly minor edits.

What do people think? PatHadley (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is the best Wikipedia page I visited. Good writing, compliments! --GigaGerard (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think merging the stuff from Star Carr house into this article and turning it into a redirect is a reasonable approach. The reason it has its own article is probably due more to the reflex of Wikipedians seeing the news coverage rather than taking it in the context of the site. Who knows though, if the article grows really large and there's a lot that can be said about the house that can't be fitted in the main article then it would be ok to have an offshoot again. At the moment though, it seems unnecessary. Nev1 (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ace. Thanks for the vote of confidence. I'm working on the article now off-line - the structural changes are so big that incremental changes would just mess up the sense of it on here. Is it ok to post the whole piece to the talk page for crit before it goes 'live'? PatHadley (talk) 17:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would work fine. Alternatively, you could work in a personal sandbox (eg: User:PatHadley/Sandbox) where it's on Wikipedia, you can see that the formatting works and play about with the structure or whatever as much as you want and this article remains as it is. Then the two can be merged. Nev1 (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good advice. Learning all the time! :D I've just dumped my text back into the sandbox (from word) and the map isn't there. I'm assuming that won't matter when I come to update the final article? Any comments/tweaks to the sandbox article are more than welcome. PatHadley (talk) 19:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Star Carr/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires infobox
Requires addition of further inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Switch existing references to use one of the {{Cite}} templates
Copy edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 13:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 13:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Name?

Why is it called Star Carr? I've been searching around trying to find out but no one mentions why it has such a stupid name. 121.210.33.50 (talk) 07:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's just the name of the geographic place in which the site was located; it's no more daft than London Bridge or the Sahara Desert. A Carr is a technical noun describing a geographic feature (see Carr (landform)). Try the original excavation report by Clark or Nicky Milner's recent book on the site for information on the actual etymology of the place.Zakhx150 (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New excavation reports published and available for free

Pretty much everything you could want to know. The last 15 years of fieldwork and lab analysis, plus lots of interpretation, summaries of all the previous literature and links up to the site database. Unfortunately they've put an NC on the media licenses but I guess you can't have everything... PatHadley (talk) 15:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]