Talk:Star Awards 2006

This article was nominated for deletion on November 15, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Star Awards 2006---> Criticisms part

I hope to add a part on criticism in the Star Awards 2006 as many Singaporeans had complained that the event was badly done. I hope to add that part.

Thanks. fatty 12:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nothing wrong with that, but in its previous format it was full of grammatical errors, but more importantly, everything was completely unsourced/uncited. Chensiyuan 12:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, most of the information was retrieved from MediaCorp forums and I think most of them are unhappy... LOLfatty 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the way i look at it, you've hit the nail on the head. those information belong to the mediacorp forums, not an encyclopedia. Chensiyuan 13:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried cleaning up the Criticisms section, it's probably still not adequate though. Requires a lot more work. IMHO, I don't even think there should be a Criticisms section - I found some of the comments to be a little bit biased. (That last edit was made by me, but somehow I got signed out of my account.) Rocksteadyleft 10:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Star Awards 2006/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

very poorly written (in terms of style and grammar); formatting needs work. Chensiyuan 01:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 01:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 06:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Star Awards 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070403054314/http://ch8c.mediacorptv.com/shows/starnews/view/1492/.html to http://ch8c.mediacorptv.com/shows/starnews/view/1492/.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]