Talk:Star (classification)/Archives/2013

Additional ratings

I've added a bit on using star ratings for things such as movies, music albums, theatre, etc.. I am working on a sort section on specifics relating to how star ratings are used in restaurant reviews which I'll very soon. --Cab88 15:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Good stuff! Actually, I had written a section on restaurant ratings before going on wikibreak for the holidays, but didn't add until I saw your edit in my watch list, which reminded me to add it (but before I read your message above). --MCB 23:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Merger from Star rating

There appears to be a semi-duplicate article at Star rating, which makes reference to a couple of somewhat arbitrary classification categories, but they would make good sections here. Unless there are strenuous objections, I propose to merge that article here (with associated cleanup, and, hopefully, some sources). --MCB 07:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Seeing no objections, and since the two remaining sections of the other article were merged elsewhere, I redirected Star rating to point here. --MCB 00:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Related articles and redirects

This began at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Seeing stars. Andrewa (talk) 19:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

There's a bit of a mess currently regarding various uses of symbols involving a number of stars.

For example:

• 4 star redirects to 4 star rank
• Four star redirects to Star (classification), which until I added a brief section didn't refer to military ranks at all, even as a hatnote.
• Four Star redirects to Four Star Records, which at least has a hatnote pointing to a disambig page.

The disambig at Four Star (disambiguation) page lists some articles related to four star and has a see also section which lists more articles related to four and other numbers of stars. Both lists are incomplete, and the second is probably inappropriate. The presence of the other numbers of stars here indicates a more general problem to me.

Three Star redirects to Three Star Club, again no hatnote at the target, and there seems to be no disambig for three stars.

There's a disambig for three stars, it's just not called what I was expecting. Andrewa (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Five Star (disambiguation) has a similar structure to the Four Star disambig.

Before starting to tidy this up, I'm inviting discussion. We may even end up writing a guideline, but let's first work out some sort of consensus as to what we should do.

Or, is there already a relevant guideline that I'm overlooking?

Issues:

• Capitalisation of disambig page names... shouldn't it be four star (disambiguation)?
• Need to complete the disambiguation pages... how far up should the numbers go?
• Hatnotes missing
• Redirects... should probably go to the disambig pages rather than to individual articles, unlikely to be clear primary usages
• Alternatives to the see also section of the disambig page for navigation to other numbers of stars (maybe a template?)
• Others...?

Comments sought of course. Also some help with the cleanup in due course. The survey of existing practice above isn't exhaustive, but enough that I thought I should seek some other input at this stage. Andrewa (talk) 17:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Three stars exists.

You'll probably get better answers if you ask at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation or Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). Both are fairly active. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 18:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Make "Four star" a disambiguation page and redirect the others to that. Grandmasterka 02:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmmmm... do you mean such as four star (disambiguation)? That would mean setting up disambiguation pages for all star numbers up to, say, five. I think that's the way to go. Andrewa (talk) 19:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks; I've left links on those two pages to this discussion here. Andrewa (talk) 00:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguations

Proposing to set up

• one star (disambiguation)
• two star (disambiguation)
• three star (disambiguation)
• four star (disambiguation)
• five star (disambiguation)

and redirecting titles such as four star and 4 star to those. Then any such titles that have primary usages (I'm sceptical that there are any, but let's cover the possibility) can have appropriate hatnotes.

Question... or should it be 1 star (disambiguation) etc.? Andrewa (talk) 19:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm intending that existing disambigs with other names won't be moved, just redirected to the new standardised disambigs. As what is being copied is information (at most) not text, there's no GFDL requirement to preserve history. Andrewa (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I think One star (disambiguation) etc is probably best (though wouldn't argue against One star where there isn't already a primary usage) and it looks as if it needs to go up to Seven star (disambiguation). There are also some articles on "n S/stars", plural, which need "See also" links from the dab pages and vice versa. It seems an excellent project to try and tidy this lot up, so that by ample use of redirects to the dab pages, we can ensure that anyone who types "Three/3 S/star(s)" (8 variations) (ie 52 in all for 1-7) gets offered all the available options, via dab pages and/or hatnotes. That helps the reader who's looking for information, and also helps the editor who might otherwise create a new, duplicating or inconsistent, article. The Star (classification) and Star (disambiguation) articles then both need a tidy set of SA links to the dab pages/articles, at least the singular and perhaps the plural versions. Go for it! PamD (talk) 08:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

There are two possible entries I know for six stars, Six star general which redirects to General of the Armies (as opposed to General of the Army which is a five star rank), and the extended five-star system for the hospitality industry. For seven, are there any other than the claim of some hotels to be seven star? Andrewa (talk) 20:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

There's already a dab page at Seven Star with a link to another at Seven Stars! PamD (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm... all the entries at both those disambigs seem to be proper nouns, so the capital on the second "S" is correct. Perhaps we should have a seven star {disambiguation) page to point to these disamigs, but I don't think they should merge to it. Hmmmm... Andrewa (talk) 03:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I think we need to ensure that the reader who types in "7 stars" or "Seven Star" or any of the other 6 combinations of "7/Seven S/star(s)" eventually gets offered all the WP articles they might be looking for, by some reasonable combination of dab page(s), See Alsos, redirects, and/or hatnotes! We can't rely on them to get the capitalisation right, or know whether to use a number or word, or to know whether we're talking single or plural stars (why "Five star general" not "Five stars general"? especially if English isn't your first language). Good luck with it! PamD (talk) 09:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, agree with all of this. Stay tuned. Andrewa (talk) 14:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Done those five, and I'm also doing six star (disambiguation) and seven star (disambiguation) per above discussion. There's even some possibility of a ten star (disambiguation). Hmmm... Andrewa (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, those seven now exist, see Category:Star ranking systems. Decided there's no evidence yet that we need one for ten, so I've just added the relevant article to the new category. But I could be wrong there. It remains:

• To merge some remaining information from exiting diambiguations to the new pages.
• To then redirect existing disambiguations to the new pages.
• To look at existing related redirects, and see whether they should point to the new disambigs.
• To review hatnotes on the targets of any redirects that don't point to the new disambigs, and on other relevant articles.

...and probably other things I've forgotten. Suggestions still welcome of course. Andrewa (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

There are many issues that entries in existing diambigs raise... for example, the existence of a grade of four star petrol, not currently mentioned in this article. Andrewa (talk) 19:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

• Nice start, but as you say there's plenty more to do! I've tidied up 2/two star(s), giving a full set of redirects and adding a couple more links from the one of the previous pages before turning it into a redirect. Have also added a consistent set of "See also" links from the Star (classification) page. (But perhaps 8/9/10 aren't needed?). We're getting there. PamD (talk) 19:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

• And have just added redirects from 2-star and Two-Star, to include hyphenated versions! (perhaps we don't need to include every S/s variation, as they all redirect regardless unless there's an actual conflict of titles, as far as I can see, so I haven't added 2-Star or Two-star) PamD (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

But those came out as red links, so I've now created them too - doesn't take long when you're already got the content of the redirect ready to paste! PamD (talk) 16:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

I reckon every imaginable star title is now linked as a redirect to a dab page which includes pretty much every likely sought heading (possibly a few more besides, but I reckon they're all appropriate in the dab pages). And I've tidied up all the "what links here" which needed it. Job done, I think but please tidy up any loose ends you find! PamD (talk) 14:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow, you've covered things I would never have thought of! Great stuff! Andrewa (talk) 21:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Just found that I hadn't checked the "what links here" for Seven, but all now sorted - the SA football club had been Moved a couple of times so that there were some triple redirects, but all now nicely piped. Until the next time someone decides to change any of it, anyway! PamD (talk) 22:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Disambigs moved/renamed

All but three of the new disambigs were moved to the unqualified names.

Checking Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/Malplaced disambiguation pages I found that this was done automatically because the unqualified names redirected to the disambiguation pages. In the three cases that weren't moved, it was because there wasn't anything at the unqualified name (which seems a bit of an omission).

I can argue this both ways, but I don't think it matters a lot. So I've moved the remaining three to conform. Andrewa (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I don't mind where they are, and all the links seem to have been properly tidied up by the bots involved. The reason there wasn't anything at "Six star" was that there was a redirect from "Six Star", and if you typed a search for "Six star" it followed that same redirect. It actually seemed difficult to create an a redirect from "Six star" explicitly, unless it had already been used as a redirect or an article name. I think we've probably now got every imaginable access point covered for 1-7 stars. I look forward to the discovery of any "8/Eight(-)S/tar(s)" (16 variations, though difficult to create 8 of them, as explained) and the same for 9! Cheers, PamD (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I should clarify the comment which seems a bit of an omission above: What I meant is, if a disambig is going to be moved over a redirect from the unqualified name which points to the disambig, then surely it should also be moved if the unqualified name isn't used at all. The omission I was seeking to criticise was in the procedures of the disambig wikiproject. Andrewa (talk) 21:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

History

It would be interesting to know more about the history of the star rating system. When did it arise? Who was the first to use it, and in what context? - Gobeirne (talk) 20:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

It's connected to motorist clubs to rate facilities in their publications, note that "The Michelin Guide has been around since the early 1900s and started as a car and road trip guide" They used an informal system of awarding stars on impression, so the idea to use stars (not points or marks) has been around for a long time. When hotel organizations invented their own formal system (Swiss hotel stars claim to be the first non-government formal stars system starting in 1979) they modelled the star rating after the existing concept. Since many details lie in the history before the worldwideweb, it is unlikely to easily find references that match fact requirements in the English wikipedia. Guidod (talk) 09:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

"Flacons"

This word is used in the article. What does it mean? --Dweller (talk) 10:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

New article: Hotel rating

The hotel sections of this page were getting very long compared to the rest, so I split them off to a new article at Hotel rating, as has been done for restaurants previously. I've also moved a number of the discussions that related to that content to Talk:Hotel rating. Help improving the new article would be appreciated. the wub "?!" 17:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC)