Talk:Standard Gibbs free energy of formation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Standard Gibbs free energy of formation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics rating

Following the examples set in WP:WikiProject Physics/Quality Control#Lists, Mid seems to fit. –Temporal User (Talk) 10:32, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Calcium sulfide quoted in wrong state?

The delta-G value for CaSO4 (s) should be 10 kJ/mol higher. I have 2 sources which state it as -1321.8 and -1321.1 kJ/mol resp. Also, calculating a reconstruction from delta-H and S yields 1322.1 for me. It seems the value presented here was just erroneously taken from (aq) state, which I have as -1310.3. Greetings, 2A01:598:91C5:CCFF:7CD1:BA58:79F1:16B9 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Value for Magnesium Oxide

The table in the article gives ΔGf of MgO is as -596.3 kJ/mol. However, calculating ΔGf of MgO (s) at 298.15 K from NIST data gives a value of -569.3 kJ/mol. It seems that the '6' and the '9' were wrongly exchanged in the table in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.115.91.212 (talk) 07:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]