Talk:Stan (fan)

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Retarget, 14 January 2022, see discussion.
no consensus, 17 December 2014 (UTC), see discussion.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Mid

This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other popular stans-fanbases

Leona Lewis fans are "buns" (full word "bunnies" used a bit less frequently). She refers to them as such herself on her social media accounts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horseluvrelisha (talk • contribs) 23:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The first fandom to be called "Soldier" were the Linkin Park stans. They got the name in 2000, two years before Cheryl Cole career started. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.64.190.188 (talk) 20:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fans of the band DEVO often call themselves Devotees and have been since well before 2000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.226.152.2 (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think people kinda forget about "Maggots" the fanbase of Metal band Slipknot, those are stans too, also I think we got "Lovatics" the ones of Demi Lovato, "Moon-children" the ones of Kerli. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.142.242.143 (talk) 21:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given the scope of the article seems to center around stan culture in regards to pop music, the included fanbases seem appropriate. With a reliable source, the ones you mentioned could find a place if they're notable. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

instance with tvxq yunho

the instance with tvxq was done by an anti-fan of yunho's not a sasaeng fan. she ran the largest anti-fan cafe of tvxq's at the time. and she was not arrested or tried since yunho didn't want to press charges. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.231.65 (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other Fanbases

"Hooligans" – Bruno Mars

That needs a reliable source. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 17:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another Fanbases

"BVB Army" - Black Veil Brides (whole fanbase) "Club Rockers" - INNA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.239.236.131 (talk) 20:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Those need to be supported with reliable sources in order to be included. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:31, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of fanbases

I removed the list of fanbases sections, as it would introduce a POV all fans are stans.

Create a separate List of fanbases could be interesting to host this list content. --Dereckson (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of term

Eminem's song is only mentioned briefly in the intro. Should this be expanded upon? -KaJunl (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stan (fan). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121019085007/http://popsessed.com:80/post/31754022843/a-little-chat-with-the-guy-who-does-the-nekci-menij to http://popsessed.com/post/31754022843/a-little-chat-with-the-guy-who-does-the-nekci-menij

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 August 2017

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merged to Fan (person). bd2412 T 20:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stan (fan) → ? – Not so sure about having "fan" as a parenthetical disambiguator. Maybe Stan (person) or Stan (term)? f e minist 15:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. No such user (talk) 08:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ Stan (term) although this is a dicdef, wouldn't merging to fan be better? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- No, this should be kept as an article, per WP:WORDISSUBJECT. f e minist 12:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see that. Inclining to merge In ictu oculi (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Merge per DrStrauss below. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to fan per In ictu oculi. "Stan" is a portmanteau of "stalker" and "fan" and while covered in a number of songs such as the track by Eminem, without the content duplicated at fan, the article is little more than a dictionary definition, failing WP:NOTDICT. DrStrauss talk 12:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the current disambiguator is a problem. Do not merge to Fan (person) (which is what I assume the comments above are referring to rather than the dab page) because that is a huge article by itself and would warrant splitting out anyway. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:01, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to fan (person), not notable enough for its own article. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 14:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I had originally thought about closing this discussion to "no consensus to move" due to the potential discussion fork pertaining to merging the article into another article, considering "merge" comments without voiced support or opposition for a move could be translated as either "neutral" or "oppose" to the move. If this content is not merged elsewhere, should this article be moved or not?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.