Talk:Stalag Luft 7

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Correction and Detention Facilities (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities

(First comment)

I am going to delete all of the names in the list because A) they are uncited and B) I do not see that they are providing anything to the article. If the person who created it comes back, you can recover the list from the history of the article and reincorporate/cite/explain it. Thanks. Joshdboz 13:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected name

Research indicates that the original name of this article "Stalag Luft VII-A" was in error. The VII-A would indicate an army operated camp located in northern Germany in Germany Army District (Wehrkreis) VII. This camp was located in Silesia (Schlesien) which was Wehrkreis VIII. However Stalag Luft were operated by the Air Force (Luftwaffe), not the army, and were given simple numbers, such as the famous Stalag Luft 3. There has been confusion between roman and ordinary numbers. The Luftwaffe used ordinary numbers 1, 2, 3 etc, rather than I, II, III.., but there is confusion in the literature. This camp was actually called Stalag Luft 7.

Syrenab 20:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article stated that Stalag Luft 7 was at Luckenwaalde, near Bankau. Bankau was indeed the site of the camp but I can verify from two 1st hand diaries that Luckenwaalde was the site of Stalag 3A, around 30 miles south of Berlin, their destination after the long forced March away from the advancing Russian army. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.227.149 (talk) 08:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name, again

This is the only article in the POW camp template that uses Arabic, rather than Roman, numerals. Is there a reason why it shouldn't be moved to "Stalag Luft VII"? Or should we be moving all the Air Force camps to Arabic? Xyl 54 (talk) 01:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stalag Luft 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140220065054/http://www.penguin.co.uk/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0,,9780141003887,00.html to http://www.penguin.co.uk/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0,,9780141003887,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]