Talk:Stagecoach Merseyside

Merseyside Mid‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

OOD

1. Bus routes changed/ destinations 2. Fleet additions/removals 3. Now call at Liverpool South Parkway, despite the white elephant claims... something to do with parent company Stagecoach and East Midlands trains....

Also the article requires cleanup, as there is rather a lot of information thrown in and needs sorting through and properly verifying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.124.151 (talk) 23:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

The past addition of Chester and Rock Ferry depots into this article, and their recent removal, seems to me to highlight a problem: "Stagecoach Merseyside" isn't really a distinct entity (and nor for that matter is "Stagecoach Chester and The Wirral"). It's simply one depot out of five that belong to Glenvale Transport Ltd, t/a Stagecoach Merseyside and South Lancashire.

I don't believe that the Gillmoss depot has any longer any characteristics that make it sufficiently distinct from the company/division as a whole to merit a separate article. Its historical development as a standalone unit is adequately catered for by the existence of the Glenvale Transport article. The minor branding variation "Stagecoach in Merseyside" is no more notable than any other depot-specific branding, and in my experience it doesn't form a particularly predominant usage - for example, transport authority Merseytravel refers to the operator as simply "Stagecoach" in its timetables and maps; the Liverpool Echo tends to refer to either "Stagecoach" or "Stagecoach Merseyside and South Lancashire"; and Stagecoach itself uses only the "Merseyside and South Lancashire" form on its website.

I therefore suggest, to reduce duplication and confusion, that this article be merged into Stagecoach Merseyside and South Lancashire, but would welcome any other viewpoints.

Quackdave (talk) 22:03, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be a good idea. None of the other operations within Stagecoach Merseyside & South Lancashire have their own separate article so I think a merger of the Stagecoach Merseyside and SM&SL articles would be the way forward JamesSteamPacket (talk) 00:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Enviro400MMC Kirkby.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Enviro400MMC Kirkby.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]