Talk:Stackridge

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Bristol

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Does anyone know if the 1971 song "Dora the Female Explorer" is related to the current cartoon? --Laualoha 19:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stackridge live in the 70's.

It has to be said that the Stackridge live performances in the 70's were a sight to behold. Much mirth coupled with a high level of musical professionalism enjoyed by a partisan crowd. An evening of true entertainment that always finishing with a community singing of Slark. Happy days indeed. GrammarTick (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stackridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160816083600/http://www.stables.org/Whats_on/Event/Stackridge_20140912 to http://www.stables.org/Whats_on/Event/Stackridge_20140912

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stackridge was or were

I inadvertently started a little editing war here recently by casually changing 'were' to 'was': a change I thought such an obvious improvement that it required no explanation. I then discovered that it seems to be controversial. Researching the subject a little, I see that 'group' and similar words have been the subject of editing wars before, as many Americans believe a group to be grammatically singular, while many Britons apparently believe it permissible to treat a group as plural, despite the fact that 'group' is a singular word with a plural form ('groups')! I'm British and have never lived in America, but on this I'm convinced that the Americans are right: the members of a group are plural, but a group is clearly a grammatically singular concept. However, to impose my grammatical beliefs on Wikipedia is beyond my powers, and trying to do is a waste of time, so I won't continue this war. Suffice it to say that you should at least be consistent: in the original text of this article, the group Stackridge was sometimes treated as singular and sometimes plural, even within the same sentence, which is an obvious error that should be corrected one way or the other. Torve (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is just accepted style for UK and US bands respectively. No-one can say either style is "wrong" or "right". But quite agree, it should be used consistently throughout the article. So I've tried to make it consistent. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Try saying "The Beatles was a pop group" or "The Rolling Stones is a rock band" - most people in the UK would use "were" and "are" in those sentences, treating the collective noun for the group's members as covering their plurality. RGCorris (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I can see Torve's point. "Stackridge", as a word, is ostensibly singular. Personally I don't see a problem with mixing up was and were; there's even an argument that they can each be used, in the right context, to reflect more subtlety of meaning. But it's probably just safer to be consistent throughout the entire article? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When the name of the group is plural, I agree that it may seem natural to treat it as plural. On the other hand, I see that "the United States" has normally been treated as singular since about 1890, although it has 50 members, more than most musical groups. Torve (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grytpype Thynne

I noticed that there was a "dead" link to Grytpype Thynne, the band that was (in some respects) a precursor to Stackridge. I created a page for the group and included the only link I could find to the band. This was then moved to drafts. Perhaps I am being a bit dim, but there is almost no information about Grytpype Thynne around. Either the link should be removed or the fact that there isn't much information should be accepted and the page made live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DRMorgans (talk • contribs) 14:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]