Talk:St Leonard's Place hoard

A fact from St Leonard's Place hoard appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the St Leonard's Place hoard of around ten thousand 9th-century Northumbrian coins was discovered by workers digging a drain?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St Leonard's Place Hoard.

Wikipedia

Numismatics: British currency Low‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British currency task force.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal St Leonard's Place hoard is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the St Leonard's Place hoard of c. 10,000 stycas was discovered by workers digging a drain? Source: https://her.york.gov.uk/Monument/MYO4959 (first paragraph)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Aglaja tricolorata
- Comment:

Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 07:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

The hook appears to link to the wrong article: St Leonard's Place instead of St Leonard's Place Hoard (which perhaps also should have a lower-case H in the article title, assuming it's a descriptive name). Assuming the nomination is indeed for the hoard article, it's long and new enough with no copyright issues found. One of the sources is from 1881, and although it's not used to support anything controversial, it would be good if it could be replaced with something more recent, or if the article could mention when the information is from. The hook is short, interesting and supported by good sources in the article. Ffranc (talk) 14:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ffranc - thanks for your review, apologies for the mistake I made when I set up the DYK - too much haste on my part. I've added the date of the 1881 reference to the body of the text (sources are limited as the coinage is under-researched). Thank you Victuallers for tidying things up. I've also moved the page to a lower-case 'hoard'. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! Ffranc (talk) 11:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P5

Contents and Acquisition

The Contents section mentions that the find included coins of the kings Eanred, Aethelred II, Redwulf and Osberht, and those of the archbishops Eanbald, Wigmund and Wulfhere; while the Acquisition section mentions coins of Eanred, Archbishop Eanbald II, Aethelred II, Archbishop Wigmund, Redwulf, Osberht and Archbishop Wulfhere. Re-ordering the latter to facilitate comparison with the former gives
Eanred, Aethelred II, Redwulf, Osberht, and archbishops Eanbald, Wigmund and Wulfhere
Eanred, Aethelred II, Redwulf, Osberht, and archbishops Eanbald II, Wigmund and Wulfhere
1. Is Eanbald II a typo? Should it be just Eanbald? If not, why isn't Eanbald II shown in Contents?
2. The list in Acquisition is very similar to the list in Contents, apart from the question of Eanbald II ... so what's the point of the second list? It adds no additional info, and doesn't relate to Acquisition anyway.
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 09:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]