Talk:St Eleth's Church, Amlwch/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Beloved Freak 22:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This is a very interesting an well-written article. It easily passes WP:WIAGA. There are no links to disambiguation pages, no links flagged by the link checker and no obvious plagiarism issues. There are no problems with any of the criteria listed above. It's difficult for me to find anything to complain about. The lead could perhaps have a bit more informational, but this is just a suggestion. You certainly have the main points covered. You could add a bit more to the lead about the planning & donations and maybe some more about the architecture. One sentence that stood out a little was "As a result, the church became too small." Of course, I know exactly what you mean, but personally i would slightly amend that sentence to reflect that the church was too small for the growinf population. The church itself did not change size. This is just nitpicking though! I'm happy to list the article as a GA. Very well done.--Beloved Freak 12:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]