Jump to content

Talk:St Chad's Church, Poulton-le-Fylde

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSt Chad's Church, Poulton-le-Fylde has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 4, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
May 26, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:St Chad's Church, Poulton-le-Fylde/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]

I've had a quick read of the article, but have not yet checked any of the citations, etc; and, on that basis, the article appears to be at or about GA-standard. I'm, now going to work my way through the article section by section by leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec (talk) 13:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC) At this point I will only be highlighting "problems", if any although I may fix any trivial ones as I work my way through the article.[reply]

I found no "problems", so the rest of this subsection is blank. Pyrotec (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Well illustrated, with most of the photographs provided by the nominator.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing a fine article. Pyrotec (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]