Talk:St Catherine's Hill, Hampshire

St Catherine's Hill, Hampshire has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 7, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Hampshire High‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Untitled

there was a big impact when the St Catherines Hill was changed and there was a big arguement about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.108.92 (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:St Catherine's Hill, Hampshire/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: APK (talk · contribs) 01:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be reviewing this one. APK hi :-) (talk) 01:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lede...

43 hectares is converted into 110 acres, but the infobox says 106 acres
- Formatted both with the same parameters.

Add England or UK after "Hampshire"
- Done.

Comma after "college"
- Not needed in such a short sentence in British diction.

Maybe swap the link from Iron Age to Iron Age
- Done.

scheduled monument isn't capitalized on that page. Yours is capitalized. Which one is correct?
- Changed.

Change Black Death link to Black Death
- Done.

Same thing mentioned above with Early modern
- Done.

History...

Iron Age...

Link "ramparts"
- Done.

Swap the Iron Age link and change the scheduled monument capitalization if needed
- Done.

Link "Wessex"
- Done.

Medieval to Early Modern...

link "copse"
- Done.

change the Black Death link mentioned above
- Done.

Modern...

Is "away" needed in "rolling away down the hill"?
- Gone.

comma after "ownership"
- Done.

change link of "Twyford Down protests" to Twyford Down protests
- Done.

Natural history...

Geology...

comma after "Winchester area"
- Added.

Ecology...

Are the plants not linked on purpose because it would be too many links?
- Linked.

Categories...

Category:Nature reserves in Hampshire is the parent category of Category:Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Hampshire.
- Then either the cat structure is incorrect, as not all SSSIs are nature reserves; or, since many of the SSSIs happen to be nature reserves, it's a partial and therefore non-diffusing relationship. Shame the cat system doesn't have a way of marking this distinction.

Same with Category:Winchester and Category:Winchester College, but I assume that's because both are covered by the topic.
- Lost the Winchester cat.

Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows 80.9% overlap between a blog post. Did you write the post? APK hi :-) (talk) 02:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't.
  - I checked the edit history and it appears the blogger copied and pasted content from here. Everything looks great! Nice work. APK hi :-) (talk) 09:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]