Talk:St. Louis Cardinals minor league players

Griffin Roberts was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 July 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into St. Louis Cardinals minor league players. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 November 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Baseball: Cardinals Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject St. Louis Cardinals (assessed as Mid-importance).

James Rapoport was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 29 March 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into St. Louis Cardinals minor league players. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Chuckie Fick was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 29 March 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into St. Louis Cardinals minor league players. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

A Section for Cardinals Minor League Player of the Year: Why is this an inappropriate inclusion?

Alright, I put in a section Cardinals Minor League Player of the Year, not simply for Matt Adams, and not to be over-censored. I have added his only at this time as I intend to add the other winners from other years, so it is not only about Matt Adams, because this is an appropriate section to include. So unless it is truly not in keeping with Wikipedia standards (which it totally appears appropriate), I would like those changes reverted and the section left alone or enhanced. Thanks. Elcid.ruderico (talk) 02:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Elcid.ruderico, 22 March 2013[reply]

I think other editors, myself included, feel that if the player already has a stand-alone Wikipedia article -- as Matt Adams does -- then the information about the minor league player of the year more properly belongs in that location. Now in an instance where a player doesn't have a stand-alone Wiki and is still located in a subection of the St. Louis Cardinals minor league players article, then perhaps info about them being honored as Player of the Year should be in that subsection and not as some sort of additional list of names of all winners past, present, future. Just myself, I've always thought of the main artcle as sort of an "incubator" for future stand-alone articles. For example, it was pretty evident early on that Oscar Taveras was going to be a future star in the Cardinals organization barring trade or injury. However for awhile it wasn't possible to justiffy his own Wiki so a subsectiion in the "minor league players" article made a convenient place to include info on him and help build an article until he did meet criteria for a stand-alone. Hope that makes sense. Sector001 (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That explanation now makes sense. I wanted to add the section to allow faster searching for the recipients of that award, instead of having to Google or Wikipedia search for individual player's pages. I want to add also, the first editor who reverted my changed alarmed me in the lack of an explanation, which led to me access his user talk page. On that page, he/she has responded causticly toward other editors, lacked regard for reasons accompanying the changes, and engaged in editing wars, which are all not in good keeping with professional editing. So, just by that amount of evidence, I find it very difficult to respect that editor's work or motivations for editing, or why this editor is still even allowed to edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcid.ruderico (talk • contribs) 04:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a place for that award at the St. Louis Cardinals award winners and league leaders page. Spanneraol (talk) 04:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ha.--Yankees10 04:42, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yankees10, so nice of you to join the party. Alright, Spanneraol, thanks for the tip. I'll add Adams' name in there, and any others as I find as that section could use some updating.

"Eli Álvarez" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Eli Álvarez has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 6 § Eli Álvarez until a consensus is reached. Hog Farm _Talk 04:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Matt Pearce (baseball)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Matt Pearce (baseball) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 6 § Matt Pearce (baseball) until a consensus is reached. Hog Farm _Talk 04:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Aaron Antonini" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Aaron Antonini has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Aaron Antonini until a consensus is reached. Joeykai (talk) 21:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Dalton Roach" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dalton Roach has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Dalton Roach until a consensus is reached. Joeykai (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Grant Black" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Grant Black has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Grant Black until a consensus is reached. Joeykai (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]