A fact from St. James Theatre, Wellington appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 August 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
My point is just that, while "St. James Theatre" is ambiguous, "St. James Theatre (New Zealand)" is not. Because of the "(New Zealand)", there is no way that readers could arrive at this page by accident, so it is not necessary to direct them elsewhere. Melchoir09:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, because as I stated in my edit summary, there is at least 1 other St. James theatre that I know of in New Zealand alone. There is also the St. James Theatre (at least 1) in America, another 2 in England. For example, cat (animal) & cat (scan) end differently (pretty poor example...) doesn't mean they shouldnb't be in a disambig together. Besides, I've already placed St. James in the St. James disambig. I'd appreciate you not creating an edit war out of such a punitive matter... Spawn Man04:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If there are multiple theatres in New Zealand, that's no problem; I will move the article to St. James Theatre (Wellington). I am not proposing that we remove any pages for the disambiguation page. But the articles that that page link to should not link back to it unless their titles -- or the titles of their redirects-- are ambiguous themselves. If you need evidence that this is a completely standard practice on Wikipedia... I see that this article is in Category:Concert halls. Following is a full list of other articles that have parenthetical disambiguation in their titles:
By the way, I would ordinarily agree that this is a small matter, but this article is going to be on the front page, and human nature suggests that it will therefore be widely imitated. Melchoir06:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get what you're talking about. Sounds like blather to me. Anyway, seems good what you've done so far. I was thinking of changing it to wellington anyway. Don't know why it can't be, but I'm fine now. Spawn Man09:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
