Jump to content

Talk:St. Elsewhere

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Names to faces

[edit]

Let's see if we can put names with the faces (per the image that is now in the article). I'll take a crack at it here on the talk page, and when we get it all correct, we can move it to the article.

Front row, let to right:

Second row, left to right:

Third row, left to right:


Others (not shown in picture

Does nobody else know?

Atlant 17:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Otto1970 04:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Otto1970 can confirm that the names for the photo are all correct[reply]
Thanks! I'll get this into the article soon. Atlant 12:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I replaced the cumbersome group portrait caption with a MediaWiki image map. It's supposed to be a stable feature, but if too many users complain, replace it with the image tag of my previous clean-up, 23:48, 7 December 2007. —QuicksilverT @ 02:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspam

[edit]

Sorry about that. Wasn't trying to do "linkspam." Was just trying to provide details on the much-anticipated DVD. Went overboard I guess, if that was too much. Otto1970 23:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The final episode

[edit]

Apologies for not referencing the 'imagination' assertion straight out. Doing a Google News archive search against 'Tommy Westphall' produces numerous hits from articles over the last 18 years with exactly that assertion; it has not been stated as a fact, but 'One of the more common interpretations', which I believe is probably the appropriate phrasing when referenced, as it is now. Skybunny 16:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recently viewed the final episode and so I fixed the quote attributed to Donald Westphall regarding his autistic son at the end of the final episode. Precise quote is: "I don't understand this autism thing, Pop. Here's my son. I talk to him. I don't even know if he can hear me, because he sits there, all day long, in his own world, staring at that toy. What's he thinkin' about?" Otto1970 05:02, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, where do we take the entry from here?

[edit]

I feel like this article has come a long way in the past 12 months. Any thoughts on what the next couple of steps should be? The "trivia" and "crossovers/in-jokes" areas are quite long, but I honestly don't think there is much fat in them. The trivia info is fairly notable. And the crossovers/in-jokes were such an important element of the show and it's place in TV history. In fact, I would argue that quite a bit is missing from crossovers/in-jokes. A whole sub-section could be done on the specific MTM crossovers and intertextuality that St. Elsewhere wove into its story threads in various ways. (For example, the episode that ends as an ironic homage to the credits of The Mary Tyler Moore Show.) Otto1970 05:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the next steps for the page would be greater detail on the various characters on the show, plot synopses, and so forth. Bjdwsm (talk) 05:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article assessment

[edit]

I've re-assessed this article for WP:TV as requested here. I've not actually changed the ratings (which are currently B class and mid importance) as I think they are appropriate. The article is lacking important sections like response (including critical response and ratings, although there is an awards section), production (although the crew are mentioned in the overview section and the trivia sections includes lots of information relevant to production) and a plot synopsis (which is currently limited to the last episode). The trivia section should be re-distributed into appropriate prose sections. Lists should be re-written as prose - aim for the reader unfamiliar with the show (as one such reader the list of characters was rather dull for me). The article includes in-text external links which should be either moved to the external links section or converted into citations as per the manual of style. Please note that a more formal assessment by other editors is required to achieve good article or featured article status. I used criteria from the television wikiproject guidelines here, article about TV series guidelines here and the assessment guidelines here.--Opark 77 09:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stelsewhere.jpg

[edit]

Image:Stelsewhere.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help writing an article about the spin-offs and crossovers of this series

[edit]

I am writing an article about all of the series which are in the same shared reality as this one through spin-offs and crossovers. I could use a little help expanding the article since it is currently extremely dense and a bit jumbled with some sentence structures being extremely repetitive. I would like to be able to put this article into article space soon. Any and all help in writing the article would be appreciated, even a comment or two on the talk page would help. Please give it a read through, also please do not comment here since I do not have all of the series on my watch list. - LA @ 17:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Exposure, another medical drama created by Joshua Brand and John Falsey, which has a similar premise

[edit]

What a Doctor? I think not. Any Opinions —Preceding unsigned comment added by N8Riley (talk • contribs) 02:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend deletion of above comment -- Its grammar is nonsense & the title is factually incorrect: Northern Exposure was not a medical drama.

Northern Exposure debuted in 1990, therefore I find it highly doubtful that St. Elsewhere's final episode (1988) made a reference to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoralink37 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend this comment be deleted as it makes no sense -- There is no claim on this page of any reference to Northern Exposure by any episode of St. Elsewhere.
[edit]

The image File:Stelsewhere finale.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peter White was NOT the rapist.

[edit]

Although every indication was given that Peter White was the rapist, after Peter White was killed there was at least one more (possibly more, but I don't remember) rape, at which time the real rapist was unmasked, and he did indeed look EXACTLY like Peter White (who was already dead at this point.)

76.125.163.195 (talk) 04:32, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see this here. I am currently giving the series a rewatch on Hulu, and I must agree with the above. Peter White wasn't the rapist. Mari Adkins 03:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariAdkins (talk • contribs)
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St. Elsewhere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Demo?

[edit]

What is a 'demo' ? Was there a protest in the streets about this show? Please use encyclopaedic language, and link or eschew specialist terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.234.198 (talk) 21:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:St._Elsewhere&oldid=1201518520"