Talk:Squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina

Medicine: Hematology-oncology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.

Women's Health Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Sources

https://books.google.com/books?id=miALDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA41&dq=Vagina+cyst&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0v46b_drZAhUJSN8KHXARAWoQ6AEILzAB#v=onepage&q=Vagina%20cyst&f=false

Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 19:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vaginal Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, Incidence and Mortality". National Cancer Institute. Retrieved 2018-02-20 https://www.cancer.gov/types/vaginal/patient/vaginal-treatment-pdq
Angiolo Gadducci, Maria Grazia Fabrini, Nora Lanfredini, Claudia Sergiampietri, Squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina: natural history, treatment modalities and prognostic factors, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, Volume 93, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 211-224, ISSN 1040-8428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.09.002 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842814001504)
Camille C. Gunderson, Elizabeth K. Nugent, Stacie H. Elfrink, Michael A. Gold, Kathleen N. Moore, A contemporary analysis of epidemiology and management of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Volume 208, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 410.e1-410.e6, ISSN 0002-9378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.047 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937813001300)
Remi Nout, Gabriele Calaminus, François Planchamp, Cyrus Chargari, Sigurd F. Lax, Hélène Martelli, W Glenn McCluggage, Philippe Morice, Maja Pakiz, Maximilian Paul Schmid, Jonáh Stunt, Beate Timmermann, Christian Vokuhl, Daniel Orbach, Christina Fotopoulou, ESTRO/ESGO/SIOPe guidelines for the management of patients with vaginal cancer, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Volume 186, 2023, 109662, ISSN 0167-8140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109662 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814023002001)
Neville F. Hacker, Patricia J. Eifel, Jacobus van der Velden, Cancer of the vagina, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Volume 119, Supplement 2, 2012, Pages S97-S99, ISSN 0020-7292, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60022-8 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020729212600228)

Wiki Education assignment: 2023-24 WikiMed Directed Studies

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 February 2024 and 23 March 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RiotingDaffodil (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Brownoms.

— Assignment last updated by RiotingDaffodil (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My goals are to further expand the information given (in revision), format the article in a more encyclopedic nature (in revision), add more references (complete?), and add a picture (complete).

Peer Review of changes: The revisions made to the article by RiotingDaffodil are on the whole very well done. They have continued to follow their work plan thoroughly. The lead sections is written well. I would suggest adding a section on treatment in the lead. In the lead I would also follow "Though uncommonly diagnosed, squamous cell cancer of the vagina (SCCV) is the most common type of vaginal cancer, accounting for 80-90%" with something along the lines of "and 2% of all gynecolgical cancers." This is mainly to clarify that the cancer is not necessarily missed but a less common type of cancer. Or if the author intended it to say that it is missed more frequently than is diagnosed add additional information. This is nitpick just thinking about a person that only scans the lead and not the entire article where all of that info is well documented. The user added good sources that include recommendations from health authorities, treatment guidelines from reputable organizations and journals with minimal primary sources used. The added sources also represent the most up to date information. The links I checked work. The article retains a neutral point of view. The article has a logical and has a easy to follow flow. The revisions in formatting are good. The info box is also well done with good information and images used. Great Job. -Brownoms (talk)