Talk:Springboard

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Swimming

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"grippy material"?? You've got to be kidding me. Dawhitfield 18:50, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

say Non slip or hi traction surface then LOL

FAF - Would like to see a section on the near extinction of the diving board in America as a result of litigation.

I came here looking for information on this topic as well. Everdred (talk) 22:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a bit from Diving#Safety for now. That text was originally contributed to the swimming pool article by Kiwilarry. Graham87 01:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Height of springboards

In Germany springboards 5 metres, 7.5 metres and 10 metres above the water surface are common at many open air swimming pools. Not so in Englih speaking countries?

In the U.K. I've only seen fixed diving boards at such heights. Springboards tend to be lower. See http://www.southampton.gov.uk/leisure/leisurecentres/TheQuays/go-dive.asp Sharm 10:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the USA the only springboards used in competitons are regulation at 1 and 3 meters. Boards used for recreation can be any random height I have personally seen. but They are rarely more than 3.7 meters above the water and those higher boards were found only at Lakes with deep bottoms. they now are mostly gone primarily due to insurance and Litigation concerns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.56.148.87 (talk) 06:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Springboard as a Second-Class Lever

Perhaps someone with the appropriate expertise could discuss the physics behind the springboard. FitzColinGerald (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Thus it would be much better if the gearing were on the base...

Horribly un-encyclopedic! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.245.129.240 (talk) 05:59, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adjusting the Fulcrum

When you adjust the fulcrum you aren't actually "tightening" anything as the fulcrum is not actually attached to the springboard. So the explanation about clockwise versus counterclockwise is unnecessary. Moving the fulcrum back and forth just adjusts where the springboard lands and bends when in use, there is no "tightening" or "loosening" of any type of spring. Also how a person stands when they adjust the fulcrum doesn't really seem relevant. Maggie.pionzio (talk) 05:00, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody, please add that to the explanation. When the wheel is moved, what happens physically -- the fulcrum moves, but which direction? Also, when a heavy (or light) diver makes an adjustment, what does the diver want to do? That is, which way does a heavy (or light) diver want to move the fulcrum? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmatxx (talk • contribs) 07:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Springboard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090727214818/http://www.duraflexinternational.com/product_info.php?cPath=27_22&products_id=31 to http://www.duraflexinternational.com/product_info.php?cPath=27_22&products_id=31

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]