Talk:Sporobolus vaseyi

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 April 2023 by reviewer Ingenuity (talk · contribs).

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Synonymy

@Plantdrew: I think this is too simple. I see both of the synonyms' genera are valid and distinct, and that the species is listed at one of the two. I think your expertise is required here to sort this out. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG:, sorted. Calamovilfa isn't "valid" ("valid" is a zoology term; "validly published" is a botany term, but it has a different meaning than the zoology term); according to POWO (among other references), Calamovilfa is a synonym of Sporobolus. Wikipedia needs some updating to reflect the status of Calamovilfa as a synonym (including moving species articles). At this point, just about any plant genus article with a manual taxobox is a regarded as a synonym in recent sources. I'm slowly working my way through remaining plant genera with manual taxoboxes, but it takes some work to update the species articles as well. Plantdrew (talk) 04:38, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]