A fact from Spiders Georg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character
This article is within the scope of the WikiFun Police, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage and quality of fun articles on Wikipedia, including those tagged with {{humour}} and {{Humorantipolicy}}. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the Wikipedia talk:WikiFun Police discussion, see a list of open tasks, or submit a request for maintenance or coverage.WikiFun PoliceWikipedia:WikiFun PoliceTemplate:WikiProject FunWikiFun Police
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Okay, I know we usually frown upon regurgitating meme references as DYK hooks, but in this case, the hook is actually 1. verifiably true and 2. pertinent to the story as a fact. So, if some leniency could be applied to put this in the quirky slot, I'd be grateful :)
Given that Tiidenberg et al. (or, more likely, their copy editor) unmangled the deliberate errors in the "We Georg" quote - "the average person spends 0 hours per month. We Georg, who live in caves & spend over 23 hours on Tumblr each day, are outliers and should not have been counted" - is it worth having the original as well (or instead) ? DS (talk) 03:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]