Talk:Spiderr

Spiderr has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 22, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

@TylerBurden @MPGuy2824 I'm reading the WP:NALBUMS and this article doesn't seem to meet the criteria in its current form. Would you @TylerBurden be able to update the article and establish the notability? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DaxServer I'll see about adding some more references covering the album. TylerBurden (talk) 20:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @TylerBurden — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DaxServer If you didn't notice, more sources were added. TylerBurden (talk) 10:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Pass LastJabberwocky (talk) 16:36, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Spiderr/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 21:04, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: LastJabberwocky (talk · contribs) 17:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again :) LastJabberwocky (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for taking another review!!!! Locust member (talk) 14:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems good, promoting! LastJabberwocky (talk) 16:36, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Composition

Yannik Gölz from laut.de wrote that "sometimes you have to find the pop elements behind a very unusual façade" I think the sentence feels slightly awkward, because it doesn't mention the album and sounds like Confucius' quote. I think we can cut "sometimes you have to find" and add these two songs the article mentions as examples ("I Am Slowly But Surely Losing Hope" and "Dresden Er").

Maybe Done? Check yourself to see if I did what I needed to do. Locust member (talk) 14:41, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to point out as a possible tweak—both sentences from Pitchfork talk about album's emotions and celestial/otherworldly aesthetics. They can be merged, if it would make a good readable sentence.

Awesome, thanks! Done Locust member (talk) 14:41, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Songs

Both "chiptune" and "16-bit era" seem to provide the same meaning and link to one page.

Unwikilinked 16-bit, but I left it in since Attard is talking about the 16-bit era of music which I think is different than chiptune. Locust member (talk) 14:42, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

it sees Bladee making his lyrics more varied. Can you make it more specific? In what department the album is varied: covers a more varied array of topic or his language is more varied, colorful?

The source states that "Bladee's lyrical world is also increasingly nuanced", so I just changed varied to nuanced. Locust member (talk) 14:46, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Links and sources

All links are archived, all sources are good per WP:A/C and my experience. Y
While looking through the sources, I couldn't verify this ""Icarus 3reestyle" also received a music video" attached to the 7th source.
The article links the song; this is fine per one of the guidelines (I've been searching for it but can't find it) where it states that a youtube link, tweet, post, etc. is usable if included by a secondary source. Locust member (talk) 14:56, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.