Talk:Speechless (Michael Jackson song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cavie78 (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
(yes):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
(citations to reliable sources):
(OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
(focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
(appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Good work Pyrrhus, the article is well written and comprehensive, in many ways the perfect GA song article. I have a small number of minor concerns so I'll put the article on hold for now until they're dealt with. Cavie78 (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- "In the production of "Speechless", Jackson collaborated with musicians such as Jeremy Lubbock..." I think this could be worded better - I was unsure what you meant on first read through. Would suggest changing to something like "Jackson collaborated with musicians including Jeremy Lubbock ... during the production of "Speechless"."
- There should be alt text for the cover image.
- "Nikolas Markantonatos of The Daily Collegian in Massachusetts expressed that one could "nearly feel Jackson's energy bursting through the seams..." Expressed is the wrong word, change to "stated"? "suggested"?
- Suggest linking "digitally edited" to Digital audio editor and "mixed" to Audio mixing (recorded music) in the 'Writing and recording' section
- In my opinion it would be good to include the fact that the music clip features the track's chorus in the description so that users know what they're listening to.
- Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I believe I have addressed all of your concerns. Thanks, Pyrrhus16 14:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Excellent, have now promoted! Cavie78 (talk) 14:17, 28 April 2010 (UTC)