Jump to content

Talk:Special Branch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The intelligence work of Special Branch was often overlooked in some circles

[edit]

Oh, dear ... more pretend 'encyclopaedia' stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.118.106 (talk) 21:48, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Its says in the UK part that special branch are responsible for the security of non royals. Could anyone please tell me who is responsible for the safety of royals? Thanks --89.56.149.66 13:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Royalty Protection section of the Protection Command of Specialist Operations (SO14) of the Metropolitan Police Service. -- Arwel (talk) 21:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dident Special Branch also handle Royalty protection at one point as well?Cfagan1987 (talk) 02:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overview of British intelligence - new article

[edit]

The United Kingdom intelligence community page addresses the broad issues in this field, such as the relative scope of MI5 and MI6 (as mentioned above). Starting with the list of key agencies shown at the global List of intelligence agencies. It should provide an appropriate place to deal with some of the ambiguities that the present atomised articles fail to cover well.

To discuss, please use this Talk page.

Special branch of the Thai police

[edit]

It is true that the Special Branch of the Royal Thai Police is responsible, among otheres, for matters concerning citizenship of Thailand. At one point in the past it used to have something to do with passports too, but no longer. The so-called "Special Branch" cited in the reference as having something to do with (Myanmar) passport holders, is not the unit under the Thai police at all, but an authority under the Myanmar Ministry of Home Affairs. The quoted article was clear that the said "Special Branch" from Myanmar and was dealing with its own people, albeit through its office in Ranong Province, Thailand. Therefore I have deleted all references to this matter including the source, as they are irrelevant to the Thai special Branch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.253.11.18 (talk) 07:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Doesn't the last quote in the UK section need some explaination?192.154.63.77 (talk) 22:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Besides, it does not sound completely unbiased: one may be equally interested in the behaviour of radicals towards the police as well as vice versa. Mb 3r7864 (talk) 02:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Special Branch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Special Branch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Special Branch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting article to separate pages

[edit]

Looks like someone suggested it on the page. Ominae (talk) 02:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Special Branch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Special_Branch&oldid=1200346323"