Talk:Sparticle

Comments

The phrase "up to a thousand times greater" is inadequate: for instance, selectrons must be at least a few hundred thousand times as massive as electrons if they exist.

Furthermore, it is not clear that the LHC will be "adequate" to determine positively whether or not sparticles exist.128.135.96.219 (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

It seems to me that sparticle and superpartner cover the same thing. I therefore suggest that they be merged.SkyLined (talk) 20:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I consider it to fundamentally alternate the way TeV physics works, I anticipate a stronger encyclopedia later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.91.38 (talk) 09:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Merge! (I cannot see whether 92.232.91.38:s comment says "yes" or "no"). Said: Rursus (☻) 16:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge it. But keep the name superpartner. C mon987 (talk) 05:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merged. Oops, I better rename it superpartner. MP ^{(talk•contribs)} 18:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]