Talk:Space (The X-Files)

Space (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Space (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 22, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
January 17, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Space (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will begin read through and initial review within 24 hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

Col. Belt. The infobox says Lieutenant Colonel. Can you write it in full please?
In hospital Belt continues to wrestle with the presence possessing him, and eventually leaps to his death. Where does he jump from, the hospital roof?
Got the first, clarified the second. GRAPPLE X 13:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, can't help thinking though the infobox image looks like Dr. Phil.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Sound job. No problems here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prediction of Columbia Disaster

Hey I can’t find discussion anywhere but it seems notable that the plot device for the final “sabotage” event involves missing/damaged ceramic tiles on the orbiter, the same issue that cost the lives of the Columbia crew a decade later.

The Challenger reference earlier is considered distasteful but this seems notably prophetic, though the cause was a design fault and lack of contingency plans with the foam malfunction as opposed to mars face ghost intervention. 60.242.5.194 (talk) 14:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you throw enough ideas at the wall, some of 'em will stick.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]