This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The AFT section of the ship was rolled out and stacked a few days ago, however the ship hasnt got its AFT flaps installed yet. should we keep it as under construction should it be operational? AllThingsSpace33 (talk) 04:10, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately this article seems really difficult to understand for anyone who isn’t an engineer. It is filled with jargon like “sump”, “downcomers”, and “stringers “. If some of these terms could be explained or simplified the article would be much improved. Jthawort (talk) 22:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]