Talk:Soyot

Russia: Demographics & ethnography Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

Mongols Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central Asia: Tuva Low‑importance

	Asia portal Soyot is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Tuva task force.

Names

Soyotes or Soyons are alternate names, as per Tatars#Abakan_Tatars.--Imz 14:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

more information about Soyots...

... one could find in Ossendowski's book Beasts, Men and GodsFerdynand Antoni Ossendowski

The language is alive

and i need any language code of the Soyot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.26.235.66 (talk) 10:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Soyot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150119065908/http://totempeople.hypermart.net/requiem.htm to http://totempeople.hypermart.net/requiem.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

false categories

Using the Buryat language does not mean that they are Mongols or Buryats. The same as in China, the use of the Chinese language by the Mongols or the transition of some Mongols to the Chinese language does not mean that they became Chinese. And the one who introduced these categories is biased, but most of them act in Ruviks, where he has a lot of them, including the people Afshars whom he also includes in the category of Mongolian peoples only on the basis of the fact that some of them once knew the Mongolian language. And assigning categories on this basis looks like pan-Mongolism. 46.211.169.9 (talk) 08:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed ethnic identity is more complex than the language spoken. But it also more complex than genetic heritage or any other simple factor. It is entirely possible for a people to belong to two larger ethnic groups; in this case Soyot are Samoyedic, Turkic and Mongolic.

If you know the history of the Soyot you'd know that we're descendants of Samoyedic people who migrated to the Sayan and consequentely assimilated into the local existing cultures, that includes both Turkic and Mongolic cultures. If you're so sure to deny the Mongolic part of our cultural identity, then you should also campaign to remove the Turkic part.

Also if you're slinging around delusional accusations that can easily be falsified, you're not going to gain support, or even make people attempt to take you seriously. Kardoen (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there is no need to speak on their behalf, misleading the participants, falsely introducing yourself as one of them, in order to create a sense of trust in your words. And besides, where are the sources that they are Buryats and Mongols? 46.211.172.57 (talk) 12:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of whose behalf? Needlessly accusing others of being a sock-puppet does not make your point of view more right. It just makes you a twat. If you can't behave in a reasonable manner the discission is over. Kardoen (talk) 13:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Provide links that immediately open to reliable, unbiased sources, including indicating pages to read so that everyone can see that they are Buryats, Mongols, according to the categories that you want to contribute and return. First, sources for discussion on the discussion page and then after discussion and agreement in the text of the article, because there is an incorrect interpretation of the source or there is no such concept in the source at all46.211.153.228 (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]