Jump to content

Talk:Soviet destroyer Gnevny (1936)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CaptainEek (talk · contribs) 23:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Issues taken care of
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Earwig's CopyVio came back clean, see no other evidence of violations/plagiarism (although I do note that the "D&D" section is almost verbatim from Gnevny-class destroyer, not sure if attribution was provided in edit sums...?)
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Photo is in public domain
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Although I would wish for an actual picture of the Gnevny it seems that no actual pictures of it survive or are available. Nominators, can you confirm?
7. Overall assessment. Nicely done!

Things to fix:

Congrats folks! This article has passed GA! I will be updating the talkpage shortly to reflect that. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 04:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]