Talk:Southwest Airlines Flight 1248

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Does anyone have more information/sources on the nose gear collapse? Specifically, did it happen BEFORE the plane overran the runway or after? The current article text reads as if the collapse happened on the runway itself, but I'm suspicious of that. I have no sources though. 12.208.12.201 03:02, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BBC reports "as it tried to land", which suggests that it was at or shortly after touchdown, and not later. Guinness 13:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New NTSB press release

The NTSB just released this. Possibly of use for article expansion. Blood red sandman 18:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Return to Airport

How did the plane get back to the airport after the crash, as seeing it suffered little damage? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.151.77 (talk) 21:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fence?

How did the plane end up there? I don't see a fence anywhere...form the photo is looks like it was gently placed in the middle of the intersection...how did it get there without wing damage??? Also, since the wingspan is wider than the streets how on earth did they "tow the plane back to the airport for further inspection"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.174.74 (talk) 04:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

This article has the picture for Southwest Airlines Flight 1455 I'm going to delete it if you don't mind. 64.180.31.59 (talk) 21:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect approach chart

The approach chart for the ILS 31C was not the one used during the accident. Southwest uses the ILS Z 31C which is a special procedure, the chart can be found here https://www.ntsb.gov/events/2006/ChicagoIL%20SW/Exhibits/347777.pdf

Incorrect approach chart

The approach chart for the ILS 31C was not the one used during the accident. Southwest uses the ILS Z 31C which is a special procedure, the chart can be found here https://www.ntsb.gov/events/2006/ChicagoIL%20SW/Exhibits/347777.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.208.80.9 (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Luton Airport Facebook Controversy

On 14th March 2013, a new member of staff posted the picture of the crash on Luton Airport's official Facebook page. The picture sparked complaints, with the caption of, "Because we are such a super airport...this is what we prevent you from when it snows...Weeeee :)" I'm not sure this is 100% relevant, so I shall leave it here along with a BBC source that someone may add in should they please. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-21782339 Predspread (talk) 17:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Southwest Airlines Flight 1248. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071204005759/http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNumSQL.asp?NNumbertxt=286WN to http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNumSQL.asp?NNumbertxt=286WN
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2007/AAR0706.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.southwest.com/flt1248/flt1248_index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]