Talk:South Jordan, Utah

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the South Jordan, Utah article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

South Jordan, Utah has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 29, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
April 7, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
April 27, 2010	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Good article

United States: Utah Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:South Jordan, Utah/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This is a very well-presented article on a city. It covers pretty much everything that one would expect in a city article: history, geography, demographics, attractions, notable residents, etc. All of the sources look fine, and I see no issues with original research or low source quality. I don't see any fact that's unsourced, nor do I see any issue with the prose. The intro is long enough; the pictures and graphs are appropriately captioned, credited and licensed; there are no content disputes; no bias; no important information that's missing. "Notable Natives" is fine as a list, since it's a short list and changing it to prose would only make for a super-short section. Overall, I see absolutely no reason not to pass this article. Very good work all around. Reviewer: Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too much of the County and less of the city

Quite a portion of the page is better suited to be included in Salt Lake County, Utah, rather than South Jordan, Utah. Any way to move this portion off South Jordan, Utah page? Samuelsenwd (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on South Jordan, Utah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]