Talk:South Carolina Exposition and Protest

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 19, 2010, December 19, 2012, December 19, 2015, December 19, 2016, December 19, 2018, and December 19, 2023.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States History

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Untitled

This article is very inaccurate, and misleading... The Exposition and Protest were not a single document, they were two. The "Exposition" is an essay written by Calhoun. The "Protest" consist of the actual resolutions adopted by the General Assmbly of South Carolina. I will fix these errors soon. - S.A. 03/21/2006

Yeah,this is a terrible description. I don't know anything about the Protest, but this doesn't sound tht much like the Exposition. Did the Exposition definitely declare SC's decision to secede if the tariff were enforced, or does it just nullify the tariff within state borders? Also, it would be good to have something on the influence of the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions and and the failure of nullification. - Dana O. Nov. 29, 06

That explains why the words "the latter bold their portion by the same tenure as the former", with an apparent typo, do not resemble anything in the source cited. Maproom (talk) 00:49, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]