Talk:South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018

South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 13, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A fact from South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the second match of South Africa women's tour of England in 2018 was the first time a women's international cricket match had featured three centuries?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018.

Wikipedia

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket: Women's cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Women's cricket task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Cricket Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's cricket task force.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the second match of South Africa women's tour of England in 2018 was the first time a women's international cricket match had featured three centuries? Source: "the first women’s game to feature three centuries" (The Guardian)

Reviewed: Three's a Crowd (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic)

5x expanded by Harrias (talk). Self-nominated at 20:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: - in progress
Overall: Interesting hook, and everything looks to be in order. Just waiting on QPQ. (Sidenote: I ought to watch more cricket.) MSG17 (talk) 23:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MSG17: Added QPQ. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 08:37, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Passed MSG17 (talk) 13:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

" 9 – 15 June 2018" should be unspaced. Might be the template, but that needs to be addressed.
- Yeah, it's the template. I need to look at some coding in other templates to see how to make this work. I'll come back on this one later. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Okay, worked this out and fixed now. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 10:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Venue table could use row and col scopes.
- Yeah. Any thoughts on that? I'm not even convinced that I like the table: I added it on a whim to see if it seemed useful. I sort of think it is, and sort of think it isn't. I can't see any realistic way to make it accessible (which isn't actually a GA requirement, but I would prefer to if possible.) Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And the map image needs a caption explaining what we're seeing, people unfamiliar with the geography of the UK may not even realise what they're looking at.
"their tour of England" I would reinforce the subject in this opening para, and say "their 2018 tour of England"
- Done. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"May: omitting" strange tense after a colon, perhaps replace with a comma.
- Done. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Link wicket-keeper.
- Linked. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Brits was suggested" by whom?
- Added. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Syd Egan's preview" who is he and why is his opinion noteworthy?
- Expanded this slightly to provide more context. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"14 player squad" 14-player
- Duh, done. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"The first match was .." I'm not sure you've explained/linked WODI in the main body (you did in the lead) so here would be a good chance to do that.
- Good idea, added. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"played at New Road, Worcester" could add the date here too in the prose (and for each subsequent match).
- Added. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"first bowling change" what style of bowling?
- Is this necessary? I don't think the article notes what style of bowling any of the players have? Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Suné Luus is missing a diacritic here.
"and Suné Luus inside" linked in the previous para (see point preceding).
- Nice spot for this pair. I missed the first, and the duplicate detector didn't flag it up because they were different! Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"be caught out by" this means different things to different people, perhaps just "caught" or "caught off the bowling of..."?
- Removed "out", how is that? (So to speak.) Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"two balls later" repetitive "balls", maybe deliviries.
- Changed. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Should link Century (cricket) in both lead and here.
- Gah, I though I'd got all the jargon! Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"were losing regular" regularly losing...
- Yup, changed. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"hit the wickets" do you mean stumps?
- They're the ones, changed. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"also out , stumped" remove first space before comma.
- Oops! Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"were unable to add much to the" did not add
- Changed. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notes b and c are fragments so do not need full stops.
- Removed. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 4: SHOUTING.
- Changed to Title Case. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"2017–20 ICC Women's Championship" usage throughout should be "2017–2020 ICC Women's Championship" as MOS has changed a while back for year ranges.
- All uses in the article already matched that. Changed the navbox, but I haven't touched the category, which is beyond the purview of the article anyway. (I'll get to it, but categories are a pain...) Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Cheers, replies above. First couple are outstanding as described. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think, having added col scopes, and given the images have alt and there's now a label for the map (which I added with the scopes), it's as good as it can be for what it is, and as you say, not GA criterion in any case, so I'm good to go with this. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:28, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BBC match reports

Hi. For info, I found the match reports from the BBC:

Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]