Talk:Souterrain

Moved parenthetical criticisms to this talk page

I'm no expert. These criticisms seem to merit consideration, but they do not belong in the article in it's current format. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lanser84 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Souterrain is a name given by archaeologists to a type of underground structure associated with the Atlantic Iron Age. Regional names include earth houses, fogous and Pictish houses and they appear to have been brought northwards from Gaul during the late Iron age. **(No the earliest souterrains are dated to the later Bronze Age are in the Northern Isles of Scotland)**

The name comes from the French language, where it means "underground passageway". **(No it literally simply means "underground")**

Souterrains are underground galleries and in their early stages were always associated with a settlement **(No- not proven for every example).** The galleries were dug out and then lined with stone slabs before being reburied. They do not appear to have been used for burial or ritual purposes **(Wrong again - several of the excavated Orcadian examples contained human remains in a variety of arrangements)** and it has been suggested that they were food stores or hiding places during times of strife, although some of them would have had very obvious entrances. They may be connected with the same people who built brochs **(No not always- as mentioned above- the Northern Isles examples predate the Middle Iron Age Broch period).**

Observations

Extracting the anonymous insertions for a closer look:

(No the earliest souterrains are dated to the later Bronze Age are [sic] in the Northern Isles of Scotland)

→No citation. However, this may be one item worth looking into further.

(No it literally simply means "underground")

→Casell's French Dictionary: Souterrain, masculine noun, underground vault or cavern.

(No- not proven for every example)

→No citation, no dates.

(Wrong again - several of the excavated Orcadian examples contained human remains ... )

→No citation, no dates.

(No not always- as mentioned above- the Northern Isles examples predate the Middle Iron Age Broch period)

→Idle carping, "may be" did not mean "always" in any case.

All in all, not very helpful. (A comparison of contribs suggests that 194.35.219.100, who added the parenthetical criticisms to the article 10:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC), may be the same as Freescotlandparty.) Athænara ✉ 05:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other languages

I added that in other languages the word is sometimes used for 'basement'. This is the case in Dutch, but I believe also in other languages. Also, in French it may mean 'underground passageway', but that is not the literal translation. It stems from 'sous terrain', which means 'under ground'. DirkvdM 14:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

in German as well

Merger proposal

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Not merged --Salix (talk): 21:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is logical and useful to readers to merge Fogou into this page, and would like any help/suggestions other editors may ahve as to the best way to go about it. Thanks.--Doug Weller (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. There is certainly some overlap on these articles, but the literature is rather specific as to the names associated with specific sites and correspondingly the generally accepted geographic range of each. The literature is also somewhat specific on design characteristics of each. Why not let the pages evolve on their own? Each page could potentially become very large, given the amount of content available. There is no reason why the alternative terms can't be discussed in each article. It is not up to Wikipedia to make such subtle and historic word uses into a "vanilla" solution, where we kill off one name for posterity. Cheers. Hadrianheugh (talk) 21:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CommentPaul Bahn's Penguin Dictionary of Archaeology defines Fogou as a souterrain. The article on Fogou gives them a range of northern Europe. You talk about 'the literature', yet it isn't in the article. Could you please let me know what it is? I'd be interested because I haven't seen anything that distinguished between the two terms by design characteristics. Not that that is a reason to have separate articles.--Doug Weller (talk) 21:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Late to the party, but I oppose the merger - largely for the reasons given by Hadrianheugh above. The two types of structure are called the different names in the regions that they are found, with very little (no?) overlap. They are not archaeologically identical in any case. Lianachan (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - similar reasons to those already stated.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Great Court at Baalbek

Is obviously not Celtic but Cook uses the word souterrain to refer to its subterranean chamber. The word obviously has additional senses to the one focused on in this article and needs (at the very least) a disambiguation page and hatnote. Treatment of the other sense within the article is probably even better, since it's obviously a related sense. — $Llywelyn II$ 02:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Souterrain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927161228/http://highlandfolk.museum/raitts.php to http://highlandfolk.museum/raitts.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]