Talk:Sophie's World
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sophie's World article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Game?
[edit]eeggs.com has an easter egg for game called 'sophie's world.'
Google Results
[edit]This may be a little out there and I have no idea how to do this, but could someone change the page somehow so that the description of this page doesn't give away the main spoiler when "Sophie's World" is searched for on Google? Shralk 02:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ouch! I kludged a solution that should be reflected in Google when they refresh their information on this page. --Kizor 12:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- ( I didn't want to know about Alberto Knox when I searched for Sophie's World.... can we put a spoiler warning please? 76.170.143.73 (talk) 09:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
All you who think it should be labelled with a spoiler warning, maybe you just shouldn't Google a book before you've finished reading it?! What else were you expecting! 81.178.137.71 (talk) 11:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Criticism subsection
[edit]Ayn Rand can hardly be considered an important philosopher, important writer yes, but important philosopher, when compared with a great many others who were omitted from the book? No chance.
- Not to mention that the author is kind of on the wrong continent to enjoy the fruits of Rands' labor. She's apparently a US thing. --Kizor 11:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
I think there should be a spoiler warning on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.235.10 (talk) 03:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC) One is B- class — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.224.38.149 (talk) 10:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
References Section
[edit]This section doesn't seem to achieve much for the page, and the one sentence that it contains isn't a reference! Furthermore I'm not sure I follow what that sentence is trying to convey, I think due to the poor grammar used, though this could easily be a failing on my part. Please could this be cleaned up by someone who knows what it's trying to say? Peter Law (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Reference?
[edit]Is the text in parentheses in the second paragraph intended to be a reference? Old Father Time (talk) 03:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- I guess so. I fixed it so it looks more like a normal reference now. Thank you for pointing it out. Trinitresque (talk) 03:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Do you recommend it?
[edit]I just finished reading and I do highly recommend this amazing book especially to teenagers. Ali Ğorbãnpur (talk) 16:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Image
[edit]Hi, you might want to replace the non-free image with this one. --Gnom (talk) 22:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Arts
- Start-Class vital articles in Arts
- Start-Class novel articles
- Mid-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosophical literature articles
- Low-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- Start-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Mid-importance children and young adult literature articles