Talk:Sonnet 141
Appearance
Sonnet 141 was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 29, 2015, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sonnet 141/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 07:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Going to have to quick fail this. A llllloooooooot of MoS errors (MOS:CAPS, MOS:DASH, WP:ITAL to name a few), prose issues (weasel words aplenty), and a lack of in-text attribution for the analysis. The nominator has been inactive since October 2014, so I doubt these issues are going to get fixed in a timely manner.
If any bystanders want to fix these mistakes, I'd highly recommend giving it a copy edit or, better yet, requesting one at the Guild of Copy Editors WikiProject page. Thanks. 23W 01:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)