Jump to content

Talk:Socioemotional selectivity theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Socioemotional selectivity theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

definition and differential diagnosis?

[edit]

The theory maintains that as time horizons shrink, as they typically do with age, people become increasingly selective, investing greater resources in emotionally meaningful goals and activities. As stated, this seems to be skirting circularity. For how is emotionally meaningful defined? One might maintain to the contrary that people of all ages favour resource allocation to emotionally meaningful goals and activities (because, on this view, this is simply what emotionally meaningful means), but what changes is just what they regard as emotionally meaningful (e.g. fewer things generally, or things that are more in the now, or, quite the opposite, things that will still matter a long time after the individual's demise). Yes, it probably comes to the same thing, but as stated, the inference might be that young people simply waste more of their time on emotionally unmeaningful goals and activities. Maybe you know somebody who became an ever more selfish hedonist as he got older. Or someone who dedicated more and more time to Quaker activities. Both examples of increased selectivity? And if both are connected to the perception of an impending end, these two chaps held very different ideas about what the end really means. How do we distinguish the influence of a shrinking time horizon from the more down to Earth effect of a shrinking daily energy budget?2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:3992:9E1F:DFAF:3D7C (talk) 15:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]