Talk:Social issues in Brazil
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Poverty issue is not complete
[edit]The attempt to mitigate the poverty issue in Brazil started with President Fernando Henrique Cardoso with his Bolsa Escola, a link between the school attendance of children and benefits given to the family by the Brazilian government (Wikipedia (2014). Bolsa Família. Retrieved on 02.02.14 from http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Bolsa_Fam%C3%ADlia). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.183.199.73 (talk) 11:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Illegality is not the problem
[edit]This sentence is not very good: "This rapid rate of illegal occupation of urban land has led to serious problems not only to the residents" - it implies that illegality causes the problems. Instead, it is of course capitalism that causes poverty and diseases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.139 (talk) 22:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Neutrality and other tags
[edit]I just removed the 'unsourced statements' part from the 'Multiple issues tag' as there where no citation needed tags. I will remove the other tags as well if they are not substantiated. It is ok to slap an 'original research' and 'pov' tag on an article, but it is not ok to do so without making a statement on the talk page, saying what's wrong. Asav (talk) 20:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm removing the remaining tags as well. I've seen no justification for them on the talk page, and the article itself does not seem to warrant them. Asav (talk) 07:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Structure
[edit]The structure of this article does not cover social issues in more detail. I propose to list per theme each separate issue that as a whole, will express an idea and a full description of the social issues of the country. We can start with education, health, crime, women, indigenous peoples, etc.
--Mhsb (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Education section
[edit]I've added education section to the article. I propose to add the following sections that will embrace more aspects of social issues of Brazil:
- Health
- Women
- Racial inequalities
- Indigenous peoples
- The Landless people
There are much more work to do on this article, but that's a start. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhsb (talk • contribs) 12:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Health section
[edit]I propose to create another section talking about Health. There, we should hilight the structure of the SUS, the problem o public versus private health and hoe they compete against each other, then we should move to the problems such as queues, lack of doctors for basic care services, less comfort and amenities than private hospitals. Lastly, we should list the government initiatives to improve health services such as the the generic medicine program, strike against HIV, expansion of the health system, the CMPF tax, and so on... --Mhsb (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Housing Section
[edit]Source #15 refers to an article discussing the housing deficit in Nicaragua, not Brazil — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.242.192.253 (talk) 20:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20100117151213/http://www.brazzilmag.com/component/content/article/81-january-2010/11686-brazil-believes-it-can-have-social-indicators-of-rich-country-in-6-years.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)