Talk:Social inertia/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DASonnenfeld (talk · contribs) 11:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Following are my perspectives on this article in relation to Wikipedia's Good Article criteria:
- Well written - the article is reasonably well written; it could be developed further
- Verifiable - the editors/authors have done an above average job in referencing material in the article; some room for improvement here, though
- Broad in coverage - certainly broad in coverage
- Neutral - for all of its breadth, though, in its present form the article presents only one 'side' on this topic; a reader gets no sense of discussion, debate, critical or opposing viewpoints
- Stable - since further development is needed, in my view, I would suggest that it is not yet stable
- Illustrated - no images, figures or diagrams currently are utilized in the article
I believe that 'class=start' is an appropriate evaluation of this article's quality in its current state.
- @DASonnenfeld: Have you finished the GA review? If so, you need to close it. Instructions are available on Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions#Step 4: Finishing the review. Feel free to ask me for help if you need assistance. Edge3 (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Done, thanks. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 03:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
