Talk:Radical Party of Chile (2018)

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile High‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fair use rationale for Image:Radical.gif

Image:Radical.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent reverts

I vehemently oppose removals of sourced information as here and here [1]. This is bordering on vandalism. --Pan Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 14:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Social Democrat Radical Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129012732/http://www.lainternacionalsocialista.org/viewArticle.cfm?ArticlePageID=931 to http://www.lainternacionalsocialista.org/viewArticle.cfm?ArticlePageID=931

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. If another request is made in the future, evidence of common usage in English-language sources will be important to establishing a consensus. Dekimasuよ! 19:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Social Democrat Radical Party → Radical Party of Chile – The party known in English as the "Social Democrat Radical Party" changed its changed to the "Radical Party of Chile" in 2015. Autospark (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 17:49, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). –Ammarpad (talk) 16:08, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. It has been replaced by the Radical Party. --201.241.87.35 (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The name of the party it's still Partido Radical Socialdemócrata (Social Democrat Radical Party), as it appears in the official registry at the Electoral Service of Chile (Servicio Electoral de Chile, SERVEL). --Sfs90 (talk) 18:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That is an outdated document, apparently from 2010 or something. Still, it should be pointed out that the Social Democrat Radical Party existed until 2017 (?) (Guiller's campaign propaganda stated "Radical Party" only) and then became again the Radical Party --201.241.87.35 (talk) 23:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the document could be from some years, it's the only official recognition from the electoral authorities, which are the safekeepers of the political parties' registry. There's no evidence that the party requested a change in their official registry to state a possible new name, or logo, or whatelse. --Sfs90 (talk) 05:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-oh-ah --201.241.87.35 (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So? All kind of official registries still say "Partido Radical Socialdemócrata". If I change my name to include the two surnames linked with a hyphen, without changing my registry to the authorities, I'm still legally and officially known with the two surnames separated ;) If I change my name from Peter to Richard, I'm still Peter until authorities verify and register the change, even when my new social name could be stated in some articles, but still it doesn't meet the verifiability issue. --Sfs90 (talk) 05:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Consensus not to merge as proposed (sufficiently different parties); no consensus for alternative proposals with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 11:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging Radical Party of Chile (2018) into Radical Party of Chile. The new party is basically a continuation of the historical one.Karma1998 (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. But I think it would be better to return this article to its original name (Radical Social Democrat Party, I think) and make it clear it disappeared in 2018. --Bedivere (talk) 18:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I can support merging the articles – surely they are are completely separate parties, organisationally unrelated? The usual convention on en.wiki is to create new, separate articles for political parties that reuse the names of predecessors (whether official or unofficial predecessors). The article reads as if this party is actually the Social Democrat Radical Party, but renamed to adopt the name of one of the parties which merged to form it in 1994.--Autospark (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. Bedivere (talk) 16:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have three options 1.) merge this article with Radical Party of Chile, and mention that this party was known as the PRSD between 1994–2018 (if that was the case) 2.) continue keep the article separate from Radical Party of Chile, split the article into Social Democrat Radical Party and Radical Party of Chile (2018) for different stages of the PRSD and refounded PR 3.) keep the two articles separate as now, but rename this one to Radical Party of Chile (1994), as the PRSD was technically founded in 1994. Thoughts?—Autospark (talk) 20:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more supportive of the last option, but I'd rather have this renamed to SOcial Democrat Radical Party, since that's the official name this party had between 1994 and 2018. Bedivere (talk) 20:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, let's merge it into the main article Radical Party of Chile? Bedivere (talk) 03:59, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge, on the grounds that there isn't historical continuity between Radical Party of Chile and Radical Party of Chile (2018), because of the parties merge (rather than just a coalition) in 1994. There does seems to be continuity between Social Democrat Radical Party and Radical Party of Chile (2018), it makes sense to keep them discussed together. While I see the arguments for a name change to Social Democrat Radical Party, my view is that readers are better served by having the current name of the party as the title: that is, we should stick with the current structure. Klbrain (talk) 11:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fist and rose

If someone has reliable sources on the party’s original use of the fist and rose emblem, do contribute to Fist and rose#Chile. Keriluamox (talk) 11:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]