Talk:Snap, Crackle and Pop
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 July 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Propose to add disambiguation line at the top for the physics aspect
[edit]I think it would improve clarity to add an initial "disambiguation line" for the physics aspect of the topic compared to just having an "Physics" heading on a page that apparently in all other respects is just about the cartoon mascots. At first look I dismissed the page having any physics-related content because of this appearance and lack of the familiar disambiguation line. I later found the section of the page through a link from the Jounce page.
Even if the Physics part would remain hosted on this page a disambiguation line could still be introduced to link directly to it. --Xkr47 (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
@Xkr47: I think that's a great idea. Please add it! --Neil Schoolman (talk) 01:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
So I did, but apparently User:Georgia guy thought it was strange and removed it.. Will split the physics section to its own page then.. --Xkr47 (talk) 07:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
The physics aspect should be mentioned on this page even if it has its own page. I restored the section. --Neil Schoolman (talk) 09:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Can you please elaborate why it should be on this page? I added a disambiguation link, just like other pages that share a name for different subjects, so it was in my opinion clearly still part of the page. Are there more ways to do this than the two I tried so far? I really feel the least accesible version is now back in effect. Wishing for more feedback from Georgia guy and Neil Schoolman.. --Xkr47 (talk) 21:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Missing citation
[edit]Anyone know where to find the last source? It is dead: 'Visser p. 4' doesn't lead to anything. I tried to Google it to no avail. --Scientificaldan (talk) 21:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Furthermore, the first source is also missing. Astrotyro (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- Start-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- Start-Class Animated television articles
- Low-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Start-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- Start-Class Food and drink articles
- Low-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Start-Class Radio articles
- Low-importance Radio articles
- WikiProject Radio articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class American television articles
- Low-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles