Talk:Snakes in Suits

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 February 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inappropriate tone.

Re: [1]

I have made a few changes. Jeandré are you happy now ? If not please clarify.--Penbat 15:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with the template removal now. -- Jeandré, 2006-09-23t18:32z

thanks guys - I wanted to reference the book from another article but concede that my first attempt was rather hasty. Thank you for saving me from the effort of sorting it out personally. Justdignity 14:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Wikipedia:Notability (books) lists several possible standards that a book can meet to show notability. At present this article does not include any of them. That's why I placed a notability tag on it. Why was it removed? Will evidence of the book's notability be added shortly? Will Beback talk 10:10, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to restore the tag. As soon as the article is improved to include material which meets the notability criteria it can be removed. Will Beback talk 23:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of article inappropriate

This article sounds like it has been copied from the book jacket ("the reader will be able to..."). Could it be rewritten by someone familiar with the book in a more objective manner that either explains the book's conclusions and/or mentions how it was critically received? 69.125.134.86 (talk) 18:51, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's been most of a month since this request so since no one did anything about it I removed the book report leaving a stub. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.81.8.174 (talk) 13:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional vs. real-life

I respectfully submit that "The work is interlaced with fictional narratives illustrating how the factual content applies to real-life situations." is contradictory: something cannot at once be both fictional and real-life. 31.52.255.53 (talk) 13:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate tone.

Notability

See Also list seems irrelevant

Tone of article inappropriate

Fictional vs. real-life