Jump to content

Talk:Smoothtooth blacktip shark/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk · contribs) 04:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Technical review

[edit]
  • no dabs found by the tools;
  • ext links work;
  • images lack alt text. It is not a GA requirement, but you may consider adding it in (it doesn't affect the review).

Criteria

[edit]
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  • No major issues, the prose seems relatively easy to understand to a lay person and the meaning seems clear.
  • No major MOS issues that I can see.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • all paragraphs/sentences are cited;
  • sources appear to be reliable within the definition of WP:RS and indeed seem definitive, although I am a lay person on this subject;
  • I don't believe that there has been any original research.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • given that very little is known about the species, I believe that this article incorporates all major aspects of thhe topic without losing focus;
  • No issues.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  • there has been a bit of recent editing activity, but nothing amounting to an edit war.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
  • No issues.
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:
Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 05:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]