Talk:Smooth hammerhead
Appearance
Smooth hammerhead has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Smooth hammerhead/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
I made a few copy edits in reading the article. Feel free to revert any errors. Another interesting article by this editor. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Complies with relevant MoS
- a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Complies with relevant MoS
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
- a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Covers the broad aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic
- a (major aspects): Covers the broad aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: Neutral
- Fair representation without bias: Neutral
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.: Stable
- No edit wars etc.: Stable
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass
Congratulations!
—Mattisse (Talk) 19:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
Article says one attack on human was fatal, cited source says otherwise.
[edit]Funnily enough, I don't have access to the article since I'm writing here. 92.95.216.254 (talk) 05:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)